Thursday, July 18, 2013

Ark Right to Life v Butler, http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=11215408835135124670&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr,
didn't turn out the way I thought it did. The court denied summary judgment to plaintiffs, saying there was a question of material fact as to whether the statute was narowly tailored. (This was legal error, Talley and McIntyre are controlling.)

I wonder how the case eventually turned out - there doesn't seem to be any followup reported decision. The 8th circuit opinion did not address the disclaimer issue. I'll go double-check that.

No comments:

Post a Comment