1. Lawyers are bound by the Rules of Professional Conduct

In Indiana (and everywhere else), lawyers must follow rules such as:

• Rule 1.2(d) – cannot assist a client in conduct the lawyer knows is illegal
• 
  
• Rule 8.4(c) – cannot engage in dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation
• Rule 8.4(d) – cannot engage in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice
• Rule 8.4(a) – cannot violate the rules through the acts of another or assist others in doing so

And most importantly:

• Rule 8.4(b) – cannot commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on honesty or 
•  
• Fire Gupta.
• here, gupta  
• Rule 8.4(c) – cannot engage in dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation
• conspired with the same inspector who perjured herself in my case. the witness testified that a person was living in a trailer in my yard with no electricity. 
• This was false and was made either knowingly or with reckless disregard for the truth.   
• the trailer obviously had electricity as you could tell from the running lights that are on 24/7 or, usually, noise from the TV or the radio.  the electrical wires running from the house to the trailer were readily visible.
• this was not some miscellaneous detail; this was the central issue in the case.  other than the inspector's false testimony under oath, there was no evidence either that the trailer lacked electricity or was inhabited. this may have been a malicious prosecution. 
• the case against me was split into two trials, a first one december 12, which i won, and the second one later in december. at the second trial, ms gupta sought to introduce the testimony of the 
• perjurer as her only witness against me. i objected on the grounds that she had committed perjury against me in the prior trial and it would be unjust to  allow her to testify. i was overruled, and she testified. I lost on that point at trial, but have set the point for appeal.  and now bring it to you. because the injunction is continuing an appeal can be filed at any time, but is on hold while we see how this part turns out. 
• when gupta sent the adult africanam erican males (90%), did she give adequate notice to jordan, michelle dawn or dusty? is informing the landowner enough, when there are tenants in possession? lets ask the ai.,  
•  
• facts: it was highly disruptive to jordan when, without prior notice to him, they drive bulldozers right up to the tent where he and michelle  were sleeping. jordan is now in jail. 
• he has sent threatening letters from jail alleging that i violated my duty of confidentiality because  i snithed informed on him.  he's wrong of course. i was not the snitch. informant.  he was not my client, but we had consulted about him possibly becoming my client, since he was indigent and could avoid filing fees. in both his culture and mine, the duty of confidentiality is important. 
•  
•  i did not know he had warrants for armed robbery. the day before he was arrested by officer friendly, he had seen me speaking to a police officer. what i told the police officer, correctly, was that we were doing a roofing job, but also using it as an opportunity to evaluate roofers, with the eye toward forming a roofing company if we could get a good crew toether. (as it turned out we did not.)
•  
• .it was highly disruptive to michelle when  she woke up to bulldozers outside of her tent. she documented it on video with a phone, but that phone was later lost/stolen. she is former housewife and former nurse who developed a drug habit. she was on the lam from johnson county which was refusing to let her just pay the $700 she needed to get the warrant lifted...
• she was a con artist, forget, thief, meth user, "katy" user 
• i fell for her hook line and sinker. i knew jordan was dirty but i was naive as to michelle. michelle is currently in hiding again. i had had to kick her out for stealing, but visited her in the hospital when she had a broken spleen following a car wreck. 
• dusty had just gotten kicked out of the burned out garage where he had been squatting. i had given him funds for a storage unit but he lost those. i helped him move his stuff to my yard very temporarily. i di dnot know the bulldozers would come the very next day and take all his stuff,  such as his tools and personal journals and records. i do not know wther, criminally, civilly or ethically, ther eis any dutyt to inform or join such parties.   
•  
•  
•  
•  
•