LITIGATION PACKAGE: THE STEWART CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE (2026)

I. INTRODUCTORY MEMORANDUM & CASE EVALUATION

• A. Executive Summary: The GOP Clerk Nominee’s "Triple-Threat" 1983 Claim.
• B. Attorney Fee-Shifting Strategy: Leveraging Nominal Damages under § 1988.
• C. Settlement Target: $70,000 + Permanent Injunction on Disclaimer Enforcement.

II. FORMAL PUBLIC RECORDS REQUESTS (INDIANA APRA)

• A. Request #1: Communications between Kate Sweeney Bell, Nalita Stewart, and Chad Mullis regarding the "Stewart" fine (Feb 20-21).
• B. Request #2: Internal logs and "Jane Doe" identification for the 900 N. Sherman Dr. precinct (Nov 5).
• C. Request #3: Any "Sign Seizure" orders or internal memos citing Stewart v. Taylor (1997).

III. VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS (42 U.S.C. § 1983)

• Count I: 1st Amendment (Anonymity/Prior Restraint) – The Signs.
• Count II: 14th Amendment (Due Process/Ultra Vires Fine) – The $3,000 Penalty.
• Count III: 1st & 15th Amendment (Disenfranchisement) – The Denied Vote.
• Count IV: IN Const. Art. 1, § 9 (Free Communication) – The Cantrell Nominal Claim.

IV. EMERGENCY MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

• A. Memorandum: Protecting the GOP Nominee’s Ballot Integrity.
• B. Proposed Order: Cease and Desist on all Disclaimer Enforcement.

V. MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (THE "KILL SWITCH")

• A. Statement of Undisputed Material Facts (The $100 Threshold / IC 3-5-2-6(b)).
• B. Affidavit of Robbin Stewart: Proof of Non-Candidate Status.

VI. DISCOVERY "GRENADES" (READY TO SERVE)

• A. First Set of Interrogatories to Kate Sweeney Bell.
• B. Requests for Admission regarding Jurisdiction and "Candidate" Definition.
• C. Requests for Production of Board Surveillance and Communications.

VII. THE EVIDENCE VAULT (EXHIBITS)

• Exhibit A: Stewart v. Taylor (1997) Federal Opinion (The "I Told You So").
• Exhibit B: High-Def Video of Disenfranchisement (Sherman Drive Precinct).
• Exhibit C: The Cyber Privacy Project / Crawford Amicus History.

---

The "Meek" Move for Tuesday:

By including the Public Records Requests (APRA) in the package, you’re showing the lawyer that you’ve already started the "clock" on the Board. If they don't respond to the APRA within 7 days, you have another violation to add to the pile.